home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.teleport.com!sschaem
- From: sschaem@teleport.com (Stephan Schaem)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: C2P
- Date: 18 Jan 1996 02:36:05 GMT
- Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access (503) 220-1016
- Message-ID: <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com>
- References: <4cu7vo$17q@sinsen.sn.no> <4djdu8$ba@oreig.uji.es>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kelly.teleport.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Jorge Acereda Macia (ii202@rossegat.uji.es) wrote:
- : Thore Bjerklund Karlsen (tbk@sn.no) wrote:
-
- : > Why not just measure it in scanlines? Why ms?
-
- : 20 ms. = 1 frame.
-
- : IMHO it's better to measure ms. instead of scanlines... Scanlines
- : measuring is harder in OS-friendly code.
-
- pixel/second make even more sense... 20ms mean nothing to me?
- 20ms to convert 320x256 pixel: is what you need to type.
- Or Just say type: 4mpix/s
-
- Stephan
-